I've been troubleshooting a bug in SRM 2.2 patch 2 where you can't relate 
Change and Incident templates to AOTs.  As a part of my troubleshooting, In my 
investigations, it appears that BMC hardcoded a field in the search criteria 
for Incident and Change templates that doesn't exist on either the HPD or CHG 
Template forms.

However, that field does exist on a form called SRM:SampleAppTemplate.  When I 
opened that form to look, I saw what BMC's developers really think about the 
SRM product --  the Assigned Group field on that form has a default value of 
"FOOBAR".

So we see that not only do BMC developers appear to have a low opinion of their 
product, but their bugs are not limited to the application itself.  Even their 
spelling of FUBAR is incorrect.

It could be worse though.  At least they're not as bad as Microsoft.  :)

Thanks,

Shawn Pierson
Remedy Developer | Southern Union


Private and confidential as detailed here: 
http://www.sug.com/disclaimers/default.htm#Mail . If you cannot access the 
link, please e-mail sender.

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to