I've been troubleshooting a bug in SRM 2.2 patch 2 where you can't relate Change and Incident templates to AOTs. As a part of my troubleshooting, In my investigations, it appears that BMC hardcoded a field in the search criteria for Incident and Change templates that doesn't exist on either the HPD or CHG Template forms.
However, that field does exist on a form called SRM:SampleAppTemplate. When I opened that form to look, I saw what BMC's developers really think about the SRM product -- the Assigned Group field on that form has a default value of "FOOBAR". So we see that not only do BMC developers appear to have a low opinion of their product, but their bugs are not limited to the application itself. Even their spelling of FUBAR is incorrect. It could be worse though. At least they're not as bad as Microsoft. :) Thanks, Shawn Pierson Remedy Developer | Southern Union Private and confidential as detailed here: http://www.sug.com/disclaimers/default.htm#Mail . If you cannot access the link, please e-mail sender. _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
