Assuming that works, what an elegant and simple solution!

Doug

--
Doug Blair
Sent from my iPhone4, typographic errors likely
+1-224-558-5462

On Jun 8, 2011, at 6:16 PM, Juan Ingles <juan.n...@gmail.com> wrote:

> An easy way to prevent this is to create a user record with the login "0"
> Then "0" will resolve to that user's email address instead of the public 
> group.
> 
> As other people have pointed out, there are lots of ways for "0" to
> end up in the to address.
> 
> Juan Ingles
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:49 AM, Andrew C Goodall <ago...@jcpenney.com> wrote:
>> **
>> 
>> All,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> FYI – for ITSM users
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> We had an issue last week in which a service desk associate created a
>> proposed people record for a vendor and entered a zero as the persons email
>> address.
>> 
>> Upon creating the incident with the new person as the customer the BMC
>> workflow treated “zero” in the email field as meaning I need to email
>> EVERYBODY that has a people record!!!! For use that is over 300,000 records!
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Needless to say our executives were not very happy about this, we had opened
>> a CRITCAL issue with BMC on this because it was not as simple as deleting
>> all the relevant records from “AR System Email Messages” form since the NTE
>> functionality was shipping 100 records or so every few minutes to be
>> processed by the email engine in “AR System Email Messages”.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> We needed to STOP the messages from getting processed by NTE, but BMC
>> support did not have a remedy (HA – pardon the pun), they said we just had
>> to let them process – RIDICULUOUS! Furthermore we found out through this
>> issue that this is an “AS DESIGNED” feature – RIDICULULOUS!
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> So be warned if you don’t want your service desk to accidently email
>> everyone in the company add an active link to validate the value in the
>> email field when creating a people record.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> It is breath taking to me why BMC would think this is a good “AS DESIGNED”
>> feature. I can understand needing that capability for use in workflow – but
>> for goodness sake only allow it on a back end hidden field e.g. a z_ field,
>> and NOT a forward facing field editable by users.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Andrew Goodall
>> 
>> Software Engineer 2 | Development Services |  jcpenney . www.jcp.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
>> which it is addressed and
>> may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If the reader of this
>> message is not the intended
>> recipient, you are hereby notified that your access is unauthorized, and any
>> review, dissemination,
>> distribution or copying of this message including any attachments is
>> strictly prohibited. If you are not
>> the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete the material
>> from any computer.
>> 
>> _attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
> 

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to