I don't know if anyone mention this in the thread but zero-zero (00) is also 
interpreted as Public. Had that happen to me about a year ago.

FYI
Mark

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Andrew C Goodall
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 10:49 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: WARNING OF BAD AS DESIGNED FEATURE IN ITSM - zero in internet 
email field for person is not good.

**
Which staging form are you referring to? Thanks - and wonder why BMC support 
would not know this?

Regards,

Andrew Goodall
Software Engineer 2 | Development Services |  jcpenney . www.jcp.com 
<http://www.jcp.com/>  |
________________________________
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Remedy
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 9:47 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: WARNING OF BAD AS DESIGNED FEATURE IN ITSM - zero in internet 
email field for person is not good.

When things like this happen, the only way to get rid of these emails before 
they go out is to start deleting pending emails from the staging form.

I had this similar problem 2 weeks ago. Out of the roughly 30,000 emails that 
got generated, I was able to delete 20,000(give or take). Had to keep 
refreshing the form for a while till they stopped getting created. Hind-sight I 
should have just changed the status to "sent" as a bulk modify would have been 
faster than delete.

I am sure all seasoned developers have run into this at some point.

Now You now need to setup some workflow to ensure the email address doesn't get 
populated with a zero again... The email issue has been around since version 
6.x, and don't think it's going away anytime soon.


Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 8, 2011, at 7:16 AM, Andrew C Goodall 
<ago...@jcpenney.com<mailto:ago...@jcpenney.com>> wrote:
**
We process about 20-30k emails a day - if we just shut down email then we hurt 
more people.
Our issue was to let all email through other than this one particular email 
that got sent to everyone.

In fact the email engine performed great throughout this event and processes 
all email as we would expect and other notifications were not considerably 
delayed - it was just kept extra busy for 2 days

What we need BMC to answer is how to isolate and remove a particular 
notification from NTE before it gets to the AR System Email Messages.

Regards,

Andrew Goodall
Software Engineer 2 | Development Services |  jcpenney . 
www.jcp.com<http://www.jcp.com>
________________________________
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of patrick zandi
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 9:12 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>
Subject: Re: WARNING OF BAD AS DESIGNED FEATURE IN ITSM - zero in internet 
email field for person is not good.

** why not just go to the ar email config and disable it ? or change the 
password and let it fail even...
but I think you are asking for a button next to turn off escalations that is 
turn off email?
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Axton 
<axton.gr...@gmail.com<mailto:axton.gr...@gmail.com>> wrote:
What is 'as designed' is the ability to use a group id, group name,
login name, or email address in the email message delivery fields.
When a number is seen, it is interpreted as a group id.
Unfortunately, 0 is the group id for public.

Not saying it's right, but that's what it is, and the application can
(and in my opinion, should) account for this.

Seems a knob could be added to the email engine that disallowed this,
or defined a threshold for group member count could be used to address
this.  It's not the first time this has burned someone (not
necessarily in the ITSM world either).  The notification engine may
add a layer of abstraction on top of the email engine that discounts
the use of this capability at the email engine layer (I don't know
enough about it to say for sure).

Take a system that has an email auto-reply set up.  Send an email to
that system with a reply-to address of 0 and guess what you would get.

Axton

The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action expressed
in this E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc.
My voluntary participation in this forum is not intended to convey a
role as a spokesperson, liaison or public relations representative for
BMC Software, Inc.

On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Andrew C Goodall 
<ago...@jcpenney.com<mailto:ago...@jcpenney.com>> wrote:
> **
>
> All,
>
>
>
> FYI - for ITSM users
>
>
>
> We had an issue last week in which a service desk associate created a
> proposed people record for a vendor and entered a zero as the persons email
> address.
>
> Upon creating the incident with the new person as the customer the BMC
> workflow treated "zero" in the email field as meaning I need to email
> EVERYBODY that has a people record!!!! For use that is over 300,000 records!
>
>
>
> Needless to say our executives were not very happy about this, we had opened
> a CRITCAL issue with BMC on this because it was not as simple as deleting
> all the relevant records from "AR System Email Messages" form since the NTE
> functionality was shipping 100 records or so every few minutes to be
> processed by the email engine in "AR System Email Messages".
>
>
>
> We needed to STOP the messages from getting processed by NTE, but BMC
> support did not have a remedy (HA - pardon the pun), they said we just had
> to let them process - RIDICULUOUS! Furthermore we found out through this
> issue that this is an "AS DESIGNED" feature - RIDICULULOUS!
>
>
>
> So be warned if you don't want your service desk to accidently email
> everyone in the company add an active link to validate the value in the
> email field when creating a people record.
>
>
>
> It is breath taking to me why BMC would think this is a good "AS DESIGNED"
> feature. I can understand needing that capability for use in workflow - but
> for goodness sake only allow it on a back end hidden field e.g. a z_ field,
> and NOT a forward facing field editable by users.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Andrew Goodall
>
> Software Engineer 2 | Development Services |  jcpenney . 
> www.jcp.com<http://www.jcp.com>
>
>
>
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
> which it is addressed and
> may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If the reader of this
> message is not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that your access is unauthorized, and any
> review, dissemination,
> distribution or copying of this message including any attachments is
> strictly prohibited. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete the material
> from any computer.
>
> _attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com<http://www.wwrug.com> ARSlist: "Where the 
> Answers Are"_
_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at 
www.arslist.org<http://www.arslist.org>
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com<http://www.wwrug.com> ARSList: "Where the Answers 
Are"



--
Patrick Zandi
_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com<http://www.wwrug.com> ARSlist: "Where the Answers 
Are"_

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed and
may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If the reader of this 
message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that your access is unauthorized, and any 
review, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this message including any attachments is strictly 
prohibited. If you are not
the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete the material from 
any computer.
_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com<http://www.wwrug.com> ARSlist: "Where the Answers 
Are"_
_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ _attend WWRUG11 
www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_

________________________________
This e-mail is the property of NaviSite, Inc. It is intended only for the 
person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is 
privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. Distribution 
or copying of this e-mail, or the information contained herein, to anyone other 
than the intended recipient is prohibited.

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to