The 'being open too long' reason is new to me. I just recently (middle of May) 
had them close a ticket because I gave up on their support. The issue was 
relatively low in priority but I opened it in October! They asked for logs at 
least 3 times, had multiple webex sessions to re-demonstrate the issue, I 
escalated to the management once, and still they couldn't resolve/understand 
the issue.

It was sort of a sick game on my part to see how long they would drag out 
actually helping me until I got tired of waiting. I would occasionally get a 
message with apologies about how long it's been etc etc. I always took those as 
"oh, this has been sitting around getting old, I better make some token 
communication to reset the clock".

In general, and I've told our account rep this before, I'm not aggravated by 
the lousy support, I've re-adjusted my expectations and just know that it is 
awful. It does cause internal confusion on the survey response when they ask if 
the issue was resolved within my expectations. As everyone else has said, it's 
clearly a systemic problem and not really an individual support person issue. 
It's also clear because of the amount of responses that are clear and well 
stated.

The question is, will BMC do anything more than pay lip service to the 
community?

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Pierson, Shawn
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 8:53 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Support - An open letter to BMC

**
I would also add that they game the SLA system as a rule by trying to close 
things out for "being open too long."  On numerous occasions, either myself or 
one of my colleagues has had a ticket open with BMC Support where BMC made no 
progress on the issue and didn't respond to us, then after a week or two either 
emailed or called asking some variation of, "This ticket has been open too 
long, do you mind if we close it?"

Another issue is how difficult it can be to get a support person to agree to do 
a webex session.  The result is generally that a lot of the defects (and the 
majority of support issues we submit are defects in the product) stay open 
longer than necessary because the BMC support people basically refuse to do a 
webex until after a week or two have passed.  This seems like it causes more 
time spent by BMC support and doesn't help customer satisfaction at all.

The third major area that I've run into numerous times is how it seems like 
support people aren't communicating with each other or engineering well.  Many 
times that I've submitted tickets with BMC against product defects, it turns 
out that there is a hotfix that hasn't made it to the knowledge base yet.  
Other support people may be aware of it, engineering may have it documented 
internally, but the support folks are reinventing the wheel almost every time 
with hotfixes for defects.

There are certainly several areas that BMC support can improve upon, and I hope 
they make some progress on these issues.

Thanks,

Shawn Pierson
Remedy Developer | Energy Transfer

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Rick Cook
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 7:02 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Support - An open letter to BMC

**

I agree with Warren that SLA pinging is the rule rather than the exception, at 
least on initial responses.  My experience is that the process you want cannot 
differ greatly from the process by which you compensate people, or you force 
them to choose between doing the best thing for the customers or for 
themselves.  And it is hard to blame someone not making a lot of money for 
trying to legally maximize what little they can earn.

But since I am completely unaware of any contractual penalties for BMC's SLA 
violations (without which, aren't they pretty much just guidelines, like The 
Pirate Code?), it is pretty much a moot point, isn't it?

Rick
On Jun 6, 2012 1:44 AM, "Jay Shankar" 
<jay_shan...@bmc.com<mailto:jay_shan...@bmc.com>> wrote:
We understand your frustration and apologize for the poor customer experience 
regarding this issue.  Our process is to validate with you the information in 
your customer profile and we did not do that in this case. We are working with 
our team to better utilize the information provided and ask only the necessary 
information to troubleshoot issues. We always want to hear how we can improve 
our support services, so please continue to fill out the surveys and provide 
feedback directly.

Jay Shankar
Vice President
Customer Support - Americas
BMC Software

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at 
www.arslist.org<http://www.arslist.org>
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com<http://www.wwrug12.com> ARSList: "Where the 
Answers Are"
_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com<http://www.wwrug.com> ARSlist: "Where the Answers 
Are"_
Private and confidential as detailed 
here<http://www.sug.com/disclaimers/default.htm#Mail>. If you cannot access 
hyperlink, please e-mail sender.
_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to