.................................................................................
Email messages and accompanying data are for the sole use of the intended recipient('s) and may contain information that is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or data is prohibited. If you received this email message in error, please notify us immediately at http://www.fusion.co.uk/contactus.html and erase all copies of this message and attachments. Please note that Fusion Business Solutions monitors incoming and outgoing mail for compliance with its Security Policy. This will include scanning incoming emails to detect viruses and archiving all email correspondence. Fusion Business Solutions (UK) LTD registered in England and Wales (company number 03508523) Our registered office is at: 2 Clarendon Road, Ashford, Middlesex, TW15 2QE. Switchboard: 0044 (0) 208 814 4888 FAX: 0044 (0) 208 570 8240 ................................................................................. ----- Original Message ----- From: Longwing, LJ CTR MDA/IC [mailto:lj.longwing....@mda.mil] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 03:49 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG <arslist@ARSLIST.ORG> Subject: Re: Filter Table Refresh differ if Admin User... Misi, I can't speak directly to your situation, but I have seen in the past that server table loops don't necessarily refresh the table every time you do something with them...I have done loops before where the table has a dynamic qualification, and you set the field that makes it dynamic, then utilize the table...then within the same transaction, you change that qual, and try again and it doesn't necessarily refresh the table even though the qual, and thus the contents should change. Without a 'refresh table' option in filters, I've never quite been sure how to get it done. -----Original Message----- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Misi Mladoniczky Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 8:34 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Filter Table Refresh differ if Admin User... Hi, I have a 7.6.04 SP2 system, where I am having inconsistent behaviour in filters depending on if you are an Admin user or not. This is an outline of the stuff involved 1. API Call Create Entry 2. Filter makes Service Call 3. Filter performs a Set-Fields from a Table Column, which should always trigger a table refresh This is the same workflow as non-admin user, followed by an admin-user (Demo): http://rrr.se/tmp/rrrlog-service-table-refresh-problem-nonadmin.html#goto http://rrr.se/tmp/rrrlog-service-table-refresh-problem-admin.html#goto I have some times seen strange behaviour inside of filter-service-calls. This could be related to that. How is a person to make sure that tables in filters are refreshed properly? Any comments? Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se (ARSList MVP 2011) Products from RRR Scandinavia (Best R.O.I. Award at WWRUG10/11): * RRR|License - Not enough Remedy licenses? Save money by optimizing. * RRR|Log - Performance issues or elusive bugs? Analyze your Remedy logs. Find these products, and many free tools and utilities, at http://rrr.se. _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are" _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are" _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"