I prefer to not use email or web services, because at any significant
volume, throughput becomes an issue.  I prefer to use either the Integrator
app or the API calls in a Perl or Java script.

Rick
On Feb 27, 2013 8:59 PM, "Steve Kallestad" <st...@tabtonic.com> wrote:

> ** There's no best-practice that's globally correct across all potential
> applications.
>
> If there's a canned solution for a particular vendor, then that's the one
> to use 9 times out of 10.
>
> Email is good because it has built in store-and-forward and failover
> mechanisms.  Email is bad because it introduces points of failure that may
> not be in your control and it can be slow.
>
> There are several options, but the most utilized would be geared towards
> either Web Services or API level integration - ensuring that server side
> workflow processing, permissions structures, etc. are all handled.
>
> Between remedy servers, DSO (Distributed Server Option) is most frequently
> used.  On occasion, people just use custom designed workflow.
>
> It's always good practice to utilize an abstraction layer so that an
> upgrade on one side of the integration does not necessarily mean an upgrade
> on the other side of the integration.
>
> Integrator is based on 
> Pentaho<http://www.pentaho.com/explore/pentaho-data-integration/> so
> that can be used as an integration mechanism as well - although I haven't
> played with integrator a whole heck of a lot just yet.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Christine Milton Hall <
> christine_milton_h...@pepperidgefarm.com> wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>> Hi everyone – It is has been a while…
>>
>>
>>
>> Looking for some feedback on integrating external ticketing systems with
>> our Remedy Environment. (currently 7.5.1, windows platform)
>>
>>
>>
>> 1.       What is the most common and best practice method?  Right now
>> the most requests seem to be requesting the utilization of email
>> notifications with other external systems.
>>
>> 2.       How difficult is it integrate with another non-Remedy
>> environment?
>>
>> 3.       What would be the worst case and best case in work
>> effort/duration?
>>
>> 4.       Is there any pitfalls that I should be aware of if we move
>> towards this type of solution?
>>
>>
>>
>> Any guidance or thoughts would be greatly appreciated!
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> c
>>
>> *************************************************************************************************
>>
>>
>> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential
>> information and is intended solely for use by the individual to whom it is
>> addressed. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender,
>> do not disclose its contents to others and delete it from your system.
>>
>> *************************************************************************************************
>>
>>  _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>
>
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"

Reply via email to