Documentation on fields that were moved in 8.0: https://docs.bmc.com/docs/display/public/itsm80/Updates+to+CI+lifecycle+data+attributes
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Yogesh Ketkar Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 10:18 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: cmdb asset status change computer systems ** Even AssetID has vanished from BMC_CORE_BMC_BASEELEMENT in 8.x. From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Thad Esser Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 9:04 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: cmdb asset status change computer systems ** I was just reading some of the online documentation for CMDB 8.x yesterday, and there have been some structural changes to the CMDB, where they have moved many of the asset attributes from being tracked on the CMDB forms over to being tracked in an "AST:Attributes" form. One of those attributes was the AssetLifeCycleStatus. I'm not sure it makes it any better of an idea to change those values, but it might make it less painful. -Thad On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:10 AM, patrick zandi <remedy...@gmail.com<mailto:remedy...@gmail.com>> wrote: ** managers being managers: can we change the status of the CI classes in the cmdb. Has anyone does this? any gotcha's? just asking.. if you have and the issues you found. Thanks. Classes currently are "ordered, received, being assembled, deployed, in repair, down, end of life, transferred, delete, in inventory, on load, disposed, reserved, return to vendor, customer build" -- Patrick Zandi _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
