Ok, good, that's what I thought. Must be some other reason our fixes aren't showing in test...
Rick On Apr 4, 2013 8:53 AM, "Jason Miller" <jason.mil...@gmail.com> wrote: > ** > > You will get the current definition. A packing list doesn't store the > actual object, just a reference to it. > > Jason > On Apr 4, 2013 8:05 AM, "Rick Cook" <remedyr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> ** >> >> If I modify an object that already is part of a packing list, do I have >> to drop and re-add it to the list, or is the current definition of each >> object in the list grabbed when the list is exported to a def file? >> >> Rick >> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ > > _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
