Joe, hit f5 button and try it, it would refresh without opening. This has worked for me
- Karthik On 5 April 2013 05:12, Joe D'Souza <jdso...@shyle.net> wrote: > I tend to avoid using those too and prefer Working Lists and then export > every object in that list manually. > > The only problem working with Working Lists is that when you create new > objects, they do not get auto refreshed in that list until you reopen that > list. > > Renamed objects do not appear to be renamed either and sometimes at random > it does refresh the list to reflect the new name. I have not seen a trend > as > to when that happens and when it doesn't > > I wish at some point they fixed that although it does appear like its been > done that way by design - to perhaps not perform a search on every new > save. > > Joe > > -----Original Message----- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Misi Mladoniczky > Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 1:05 PM > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Subject: Re: Packing Lists > > Hi, > > If you export a packing list, I have seen that objects are sometimes > missed. > I > have no clear pattern as to when this happens, but it happened a lot at a > 7.6.04 site I was working on some time ago. > > Check that the objects in question are actually in the def file. > > You might want to try rrrexportdef.exe -packlist ..., it will not miss any > objects. > > https://www.rrr.se/cgi/tools/main#rrrExportDef > > Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se (ARSList MVP 2011) > > Products from RRR Scandinavia (Best R.O.I. Award at WWRUG10/11/12): > * RRR|License - Not enough Remedy licenses? Save money by optimizing. > * RRR|Log - Performance issues or elusive bugs? Analyze your Remedy logs. > Find these products, and many free tools and utilities, at http://rrr.se. > > > Ok, good, that's what I thought. Must be some other reason our fixes > > aren't showing in test... > > > > Rick > > On Apr 4, 2013 8:53 AM, "Jason Miller" <jason.mil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> ** > >> > >> You will get the current definition. A packing list doesn't store the > >> actual object, just a reference to it. > >> > >> Jason > >> On Apr 4, 2013 8:05 AM, "Rick Cook" <remedyr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> ** > >>> > >>> If I modify an object that already is part of a packing list, do I have > >>> to drop and re-add it to the list, or is the current definition of each > >>> object in the list grabbed when the list is exported to a def file? > >>> > >>> Rick > >>> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ > >> > >> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________ > ___ > > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org > > "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years" > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________ > ___ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org > "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years" > > > _______________________________________________________________________________ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org > "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years" > -- - Karthik _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
