Hi Ivan, all,
I took your reply for all the others
Ivan M wrote:
The wiki offers many advantages over Issue Tracker, the main ones
being automatic thumbnails and the ability to view images in a
gallery-like format, rather than having to click on file names and
download each file separately, as in Issue Tracker.
Agreed.
Does anybody knows if the wiki size might be a problem one day?
I remember times where the wiki was out of service - and these have been
much more than the collabnet website containing issue tracker.
What should be done to find an optimal solution?
My suggestion would be to use the Art project website at
marketing.openoffice.org/art to store official/approved artwork, and
to use the wiki for submitting proposals [1] and other more general
discussions and resources. This would keep the barrier to entry
reasonably low and open.
I like this idea:
It keeps the official artwork in a prominent position and avoids changes
to it.
On the other hand, proposals and "unofficial" artwork can be contributed
quite easily and presented by a link from the website.
In the past I preferred Issue Tracker as the wiki was restricted in size
and quite often not reachable. The idea of introducing quite an easy
entrypoint to Issue Tracker might be good for issues related to
developers (QA, bugs, enhancements ...), as most of the artists are not
interested in this kind of stuff, it's no real point for the Art Project.
Best regards
Bernhard
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: art-unsubscr...@marketing.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: art-h...@marketing.openoffice.org
