Hi Patrick， Thank you for your quick reply, the advice you provided is very helpful, thank you again very much!
Best wishes, Jiaan He At 2023-10-18 01:11:31, "Patrick Eriksson" <patrick.eriks...@chalmers.se> wrote: >Hi, > >The only way to get ARTS to do QV and QH automatically, is to use a >"system" denoted as metmm. You find it in folder > >arts/controlfiles/instruments/metmm > >It is not totally straightforward to use and the documentation is not >extensive. As far as I know, the documentation is basically the file >TestMetMM.arts. > >The sensor definitions are found in sub-folder sensor_descriptions. >Inside these QV and QH are denoted AMSU-V and AMSU-H. This assumes that >QH and Qv work in the same way for all cross-track microwave radiometer. >I assume this is true, but I am not 100% sure. > >Bye, > >Patrick > > > >On 2023-10-17 14:15, suifengbenpao2023 wrote: >> Dear ARTS community, >> >> >> ARTS provides calculation methods for vertical polarization and >> horizontal polarization. However, many sensors are now set up with QH >> and QV polarization. I simulated the brightness temperature of a >> satellite borne microwave radiometer channel at 23.8GHz (QH >> polarization) over the ocean using a one-dimensional atmosphere, and the >> first Stokes vector I obtained was close to the observed QH polarization >> brightness temperature. However, the simulated brightness temperature of >> H polarization （instrument_pol, [6] ) was significantly different from >> the observed QH brightness temperature, May I ask if it is possible to >> simulate the QH polarization of spaceborne radiometers through the H >> polarization of ARTS? Is it still possible that I input other variables >> incorrectly? >> >> >> Looking forward to your reply！Thank you! >> >> Best wishes, >> >> Jiaan He
