Fred has a very good point!  That is why there would need to be 
discovery, only in discovery do you get the facts.  Before one can do 
discovery they have to file an action.  In certain cases, a tort 
claims notice may be enough to get the truth established.

KB


--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Fred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Kevin Brown" <jerseykev@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > How do you know that window wasn't broken before. Werner never 
said 
> he saw them break it.  Was the window broken or cracked is glass in 
> the house or outside?Was the window  already broken. Would of's 
could 
> of's if's mean nothing. Put everyboy involved under oath. Get the 
> facts. We could be here for weeks debating this for weeks.. 
> 
> 
> Grounds for an action:
> > 
> > Broken window is the destruction of property without a sworn 
> > affadavit or a signed complaint, to gain entry into private 
> property 
> > occupied by a "well know person."
> > 
> > Creating an emergency situation causeing duress to a medicated 
> > citizen, who happens to be "an equity share holder" in the city 
as 
> a 
> > taxpayer.
> > 
> > Terror, without a warrant or proper provocation.  Where is the 
> > probable cause?  Anonomous comments via a telephone without a 
> signed 
> > complain, an eye witness or a warrant.  The broken window nails 
the 
> > authority.
> > 
> > Excessive use of authority.  I guess in light of what recently 
> > occured in NYC Werner should count his blessings that they didn't 
> > open fire upon his house and his person.
> > 
> > I would cause the City to identify the source of their emergent 
> > action.  If they can not then proceed from there.
> > 
> > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Allan Peterson <nnjallans1@> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On what gounds?  Because he gave the city permission to search 
> his 
> > home?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ----- Original Message ----
> > > From: dfsavgny <dfsavgny@>
> > > To: AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 10:27:52 AM
> > > Subject: [AsburyPark] Re: Tommy on the Law
> > > 
> > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, Allan Peterson 
> > <nnjallans1@ ...> 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > So the police did nothing wrong in your view. In DAN's view 
his 
> > > rights were taken away and he should sue the city. 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > It's not only my view, but the view of the Framers of the 
> > Constitution 
> > > and numerous US and State Supreme Courts.
> > > 
> > > Werner, I have a lawyer for you. MAKE THE CITY PAY.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > 
> 
______________________________________________________________________
> > ______________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
> > > http://new.mail.yahoo.com
> > >
> >
>




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to