To potential new neighbor  Jim, 

A few others here worth reading to add to my previous list.  Veteran  James 
Grabe.  He must be cool because the anonymous posters are often  slinging 
epithets at him.
 
Sharon (_b283) too has a fire in her belly for what she believe. She's got  a 
wonderful life story to tell.  And she's  not prone to let  distortions here 
get by here without challenges.
 
And then there's Werner, who knows his history, does his research, and  
somehow manages to remain unfazed by hits from the anonymous ones.
 
In reference to Werner's  comment: 


There are minimal time-tables that were  built into the original 
redevelopment agreement and then extended and  redefined in the DRA. Most all 
of those 
'deadlines' have been  missed.

 
Even the bike guy is worth reading.  And there are lots others here  who 
won't accuse you of stalking or threaten to call the cops on you just  vecause 
you 
remember what they post.
 
Peace
 
 

========Original Message========
Subj: [AsburyPark] Re: My new neighbors?  Date: 3/8/2007 4:09:40 P.M. Eastern 
Standard Time  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])   
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com)   Sent on: 
   

 
 
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com) ,  
Allan Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> Ok but  there is a deadline on record which has not yet passed. So I 
find it  irresponsible and wrong to say it is a failure at this point. 
>  ============  ======  ======  ======  ======  ======  =

I've  been ressting, but I have to jump in here on this.

Allan, You are  serously misinformed about an alleged 30 deadline.

There are minimal  time-tables that were built into the original 
redevelopment agreement and  then extended and redefined in the DRA. 
Most all of those 'deadlines' have  been missed.

Regarding the 30 years figure you are putting forth, it  means nothing 
in terms of performance. 30 years is simply the statuatory  limit of 
the effect of the redevelopment plan. The right of eminent domain  
expires after 30 years as does any land use and zoning overlays  
described in the redevelopment plan.

To say that the City has given  the Master Developer 30 years to 
complete his task is just plain wrong. 30  years comes up frequently 
when property owners are discussing condemnation.  ie "My property is 
in limbo for 30 years" refering to the specter of eminent  domain.

Werner


   
<BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers free 
email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free from AOL at 
http://www.aol.com.

Reply via email to