Paul,
We would like to respond to your expression of gratitude for the fact that we
participated in the democratic process and your criticism that we have been
"misled by the mission and radical pastors that try to divide this city."
We disagree with you that it is hard to gather facts, form opinions, stand
up for what you believe, etc. We independently researched the organization,
interviewed Scott twice, toured the facility and poured over their 990 and
audit.
What we found suprised us. It looks really good.
This is Christian based mission. The background checks it performs are
screening and intakes. (It is illegal for the NJ State Police to perform a
criminal background check for a non profit organization for the purpose of
emergency shelter - but the media won't report that.) They refer individuals to
services. They will not discriminate against gay men. They offer a "soup
kitchen," emergency shelter and a longer term program that requires a
contractual agreement between the individual and the nonprofit. 10 men will
take part in that longer term program that will enable them to work at the
shelter, attend meetings, church services and essentially "get back on their
feet."
The organization is in better financial shape than the City of Asbury Park
(We realize that is not hard). They have over 6 million dollars in assets and
99% of their funds is come from private contributions and independent
fundraising efforts such as a thrift store,etc.
We have also invested in Asbury Park and share property values concerns. It's
perfectly legitimate to be concerned about property values. Missions have not
hurt the property values in Morristown or Hoboken. Our priorities though, are
with those who need emergency food and shelter.
If the Zoning Board votes this down, the City of Asbury Park will once again
end up in court racking up yet another legal tab. The mission will prevail
because of the statistical information regarding the demographics of Asbury
Park and Neptune. The mission has been previously ruled by a judge as having an
inherently beneficial use.
Calling the clergy that are in favor of the mission "radical pastors trying
to divide this city" is more than disrespectful. What exactly is radical about
a member of the clergy supporting a homeless shelter? You have been reprimanded
before on this. By typifying the clergy in support the mission this way, you
are, in essence, "race baiting" (ie Willie Horton style). Please stop. That is
what really divides our community.
We believe providing these services to the homeless will make Asbury Park
stronger.
In closure, do not thank us and then throw mud. It is not sincere. It is not
respectful.
Kerry Butch
Andy Pawlan
Lynda Ziemba
---------------------------------
Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.
