Charlie, his post stated:
"I guess it comes from inflated distribution
numbers..."
that was an intended dig at the magazine although a ridiculous one as
we've never inflated our numbers. We have no reason to.
On Jun 5, 2007, at 1:31 AM, charlie wrote:
"Why is it that when people here respond, they generally have to
attack people personally? Where in my original post did my
magazine come into play? Or are you just jealous at the amount of
copies we distribute?"
Maybe i missed a post before, but from the last one he sent,
regarding your post. All he said was a question, where did you get
your numbers from? he saw 13,000, where you saw 30,000? I don't
see any comment about your magazine mentioned!? Oh, well. I might
have missed something, so ill stay out of this.
Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from
someone who knows.
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
