I agree---Danny asked who will pay for the lights that can now not be
installed---he received no answer. The question would also be is why didn't
the lawyer check into this in the beginning. If the lawyer did not know the
jist of things I am sure a few phone calls could have solved this problem a
long time ago.
----- Original Message ----
From: dfsavgny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 12:10:32 PM
Subject: [AsburyPark] Re: Let's Sue the School Board - Frank - Give us the
state monitor's phone # & e
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, denise <denisemchd@ ...> wrote:
>
> It's not the school and the BOE thats holding up the Little League
Field ---It's the State Monitor and the Lawyer ---something to do with
Title 9 is one of the issues holding it up. There were other reasons
but the lawyer would not let any of the BOE members speak on this issue.
>
Take a cue from Frank. The lawyers serve at the pleasure of the BOE.
It is one thing to perhaps proceed cautiously and listen to counsel.
And I understand that there may be a perception of liability if the
soil cannot support the lights, etc. But now we are talking about
telling the LL to move. The BOE can override the state monitor. I have
heard it from too many people, on both sides of the fence that it is
obvious that SOMEONE does not want the LL. Who is it? It is time for
the BOE to stand up.
If there is a real issue with the lights, or something else, exactly
what is it and how do you solve it?
But from what I hear, it is one obstacle after another that is laid
before Danny. That smells. As one obstacle is overcome another is put
in his place. If they are going to do this (which we should not allow
them to) the BOE should give us all our money back.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better sports nut! Let your teams follow you
with Yahoo Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/sports;_ylt=At9_qDKvtAbMuh1G1SQtBI7ntAcJ
