In a message dated 12/4/2007 7:31:50 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This isn't directed at you Oak, but to some people, several on this board, "history" is far more sexy if it involves scandal and greed and bad guys. Far too boring if it doesn't; so history gets distorted.... read the New York Times for proof of that. or how 'bout that TriCity column? So where do we go for the undistorted truth? Rush, Coulter and Malkin -- as you've recommended more than once here? **************************************Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest products. (http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop00030000000001)
