Not sure what to make of the Metro situation. If they were planning a return,
they should be very vocal. The lack of comminication with those who placed a
deposit makes me question. On the other hand, if they were to let the project
go, they should be quick to return the funds and get this closed up asap so
people are not worried about the other projects. They rode the wave of the
press with the project start and they can expect the same wave if this gets
ugly.
----- Original Message ----
From: dfsavgny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2008 10:57:48 AM
Subject: [AsburyPark] Re: any work on the 72 hours?
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, "oakdorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>
> --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, "John C. LiDestri" <john@> wrote:
>
> > Is anyone aware of whether or not the city has a list of all of the
> > 70 or so people under contract and their contact information?
> >
>
> cut out the sales people who "had a contract" and anyone else who was
> on the "inside"....
>
> subpoena....
>
John, I sent you a private email regarding Metro's promising return of
deposits for any who want them. I am told the money is safe.
I can't say much now, but the final word on the Esperanza may not have
yet been written. All I will say that the way Metro has handled the
halting of the work was wrong. They have been silent with the public
and the city. The credit problems out there are real. That I know
without Metro.
So without giving up anything, maybe we are a little, and I mean a
little, patient with Metro. Perhaps we can salvage something here.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
