Hi,
 
    Thanks for that clarification, but I guess I had not put the question very clearly. I understand that the following is the X.680 specification for XMLSequenceValue -


XMLSequenceValue:
   XMLComponentValueList
 | // empty
 ;
 
XMLComponentValueList:
   XMLNamedValue
 | XMLComponentValueList XMLNamedValue
 ;
 
XMLNamedValue:
   "<" & identifier ">" XMLValue "</" & identifier ">"
 ;


    If the above is the grammar for XMLSequenceValue, then under what specification in X.680 is the notation <c/> valid. I understand that the same is valid when the identifier within the Open Tag ("<") and Close Empty Tag ("/>") is a xmlasn1typename. Thanking you.
 
Yours Sincerely
Ramaswamy R

To deny our instincts, is to deny the very thing that makes us human - Mouse (The Matrix)


-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Thorpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 3:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ASN.1] XML Notation


Hi Ramaswamy,

Yes, ASN.1 (2002) does permit the value notation you have used below.
Note, however, that use of <c/> does not indicate the absense of the
OPTIONAL field, but indicates it is present with zero-length value.

Reply via email to