> >However, the question I have for you ... will you >use the same strong words (uneducated, immature, >uninformed etc) against PCG? If not, WHY?
>>**** I might if someone present it here as a proof of anything. Did they? **** How can they? It would have opened a can of worms for them .... they preferred to shut it but some journalist (you know the spy of GOI ) unlocked it ...... so sad for you. But hey , did assamnet presented the poll as a "proof of anything"? Sure I missed it. But then, with all your intelligence why don't you show it to us. > >***** ALLEGEDLY ???? If PCG did not conduct one they >>can readily file a defamation suite against the news >papers. Did they ??? >>**** The responsibility to provide proof of an >>allegation is the >>accuser's, not the defendant's. Don't you have that >>simple knowledge? >>How would you react if I asked you a question >>like: "Hey, when did >>you stop beating your wife" and you protested , >>could I get away with >>asking for proof that you had never beaten your wife, or suggesting >>you go sue to clear your name? ***** SPINMASTER !!! At the very least, I will pass on a statement that what you are saying is false. Did PCG pass any such statement? With your logic, any one can go around saying anything against anybody. May be that is your version of Free Speech !! >>If this is not an utterly s****d question, what is? *** Actually, there are many from you -- both questions and answers.... just search the forum and you will get excellent examples. >*** Good that you answered it, in your own way of course :-) Utpal >should now be aware of quality of >responses he can expect from you. >>>**** I did not answer the question, again, because it was another >>utterly s****d question for someone like you to ask. I did not wish >>to use this harsh words to characterize your >>questions and comments, >>but you asked for it. **** Cool down ... you got so agitated when I pointed to PCG ... looks like I touched a raw nerve. But then again, your level of answers are well known to netters. BTW, looks like your style of answering is very similar to those whom you are trying to defend. Not sure if you trained them :-) >>I did not wish >>to use this harsh words to characterize your >>questions and comments, **** You know, I have been in this forum for quite sometime and learnt a lot from you. So don't take it personally if many of my questions and comments resembles your ones very closely. >>I like to think that Utpal's intellect is several >>cuts above what >>you display here. **** Definitely ... until he catches you on the wrong foot. At 1:32 PM -0700 10/10/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty wrote: > >>**** So does that therefore make assamtimes poll a >>scientific, >>representative and objective one? > > >C'da , as usual, you could not come out of your >habit of putting words in ones mouth. I NEVER said >that because PCG did one, assamtimes poll is >scientific. > >However, the question I have for you ... will you >use the same strong words (uneducated, immature, >uninformed etc) against PCG? If not, WHY? > > >>>If it does , because PCG too allegedly conducted >>one, then should we >>NOT surmise that everyone >>else ought to heed what PCG does or advise? Wouldn't >>that be the >>logical conclusion? > >***** ALLEGEDLY ???? If PCG did not conduct one they >can readily file a defamation suite against the news >papers. Did they ??? >If PCG first adhere to the verdict of people as per >the poll which they conducted, we should have no >reason not to heed to their advise. >But the million dollar question is .... is PCG willing >to hear the voice of people or are they moving with a >pre-determined notion (and that seems to be the reason >why they did not want to share results of poll). > >>can someone explain WHO forms a fair representation >of Assam --- > >>>**** How about trying it yourself? Is it that hard a > task? > >*** Good that you answered it, in your own way of >course :-) Utpal should now be aware of quality of >responses he can expect from you. Utpal, you can also >check the thread "slept like a baby" to have the whole >gamut of response you can expect from C'da ! > > > >>>*** Is that the best list of who consist of the >>>people of Assam you >>>could come up with? > >*** Well, I guess I missed one ..... the >Bangladeshis. In fact, I think it is best if the >poll is conducted in Bangladesh ... you know, where >our future leaders are breeding.... what do you say >:-) > >At 10:15 AM -0700 10/10/07, Krishnendu Chakraborty >wrote: >>Check the last para of this --- >>http://www.newswatch.in/news-analyses/attacks-on-scribes/5060.html >> >>Looks like PCG too tried similar polls .... not sure >>if the pollsters were uneducated and "IMMATURE, >>UNINFORMED and UNREALISTIC to the core". > > > > >>>**** So does that therefore make assamtimes poll a >scientific, >representative and objective one? > >>>If it does , because PCG too allegedly conducted >>one, then should we >>NOT surmise that everyone >>else ought to heed what PCG does or advise? Wouldn't >>that be the >>logical conclusion? > > > >> >BTW, while it is fair to assume that visitors of >assamtimes.org >>(or even those who responded to PCG) >>are not a fair representation of Assam, > > >**** Do I need to explain that? If I do, it will >certainly mean that >it will be an entirely wasted effort. > > >>can someone explain WHO forms a fair representation >of Assam --- > >**** How about trying it yourself? Is it that hard a >task? > > > >> >the villagers who lynch ULFA every now and then, >the School >>teachers who are killed by ULFA, the >traders whose >business get >>impacted because of regular >>bombblast, the journalists who are threatened >byULFA, the >>intellectuals (including AXX) who >discardthe idea of >Sovereignty, >>the NRAs ?????? > > > >*** Is that the best list of who consist of the people >of Assam you >could come up with? > > >We can see now why you ask the questions you do. > > > > > > > > > > > >> >>PCG was too shy to publish the results :-) >> >>BTW, while it is fair to assume that visitors of >>assamtimes.org (or even those who responded to PCG) >>are not a fair representation of Assam, can someone >>explain WHO forms a fair representation of Assam --- >>the villagers who lynch ULFA every now and then, the >>School teachers who are killed by ULFA, the traders >>whose business get impacted because of regular >>bombblast, the journalists who are threatened by >>ULFA, the intellectuals (including AXX) who discard >>the idea of Sovereignty, the NRAs ?????? >> >> >>>>Entirely faulty premise for the poll. >> >>>>WHO visits assamtimes.org ? Are they a fair >>representation of Assam's polity? >> >>>>If the pollsters are as uneducated about as simple >>an issue as this, >>what will anybody learn from it? >> >>>>IMMATURE, UNINFORMED and UNREALISTIC to the core. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>At 12:47 AM +0530 10/10/07, Nayanjyoti Medhi wrote: >>>please take part in the opinion poll going on in >>><http://www.assamtimes.org>www.assamtimes.org >>> >>>-- >>>Nayanjyoti Medhi >>>Advocate >>>Gauhati High Court >>> >>>Chamber: >>>Satya Bora Lane, Dighalipukhuri East >>>Guwahati-781001, Assam >>> >>>Phone: >>>+91 361 2416960 >>>+91 94350 43007 >>> >>>Email: >>><mailto:nayanjyoti.medhi at >>gmail.com>nayanjyoti.medhi at gmail.com ____________________________________________________________________________________ Building a website is a piece of cake. Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the tools to get online. http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/webhosting _______________________________________________ assam mailing list assam@assamnet.org http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
