So, to respond to the one comment, it was ok for the Science guys to want mixed case things because that was what they were used to. Ok, I can buy that. Same rationale can be applied to the C programmers. Now, let's be fair, using the very same reasoning, I can then justify MY perception that mixed case shouldn't be used on the mainframe, because I am used to it. Now, if you say they can justify their actions out of their preferrences and I can NOT do the same thing, then you surely can see how that is not fair for everyone, right? -------------------------------------------- On Mon, 2/24/14, Automatic digest processor <lists...@listserv.uga.edu> wrote:
Subject: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 23 Feb 2014 to 24 Feb 2014 (#2014-32) To: "Recipients of ASSEMBLER-LIST digests" <ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> Date: Monday, February 24, 2014, 11:01 PM ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 23 Feb 2014 to 24 Feb 2014 (#2014-32) LISTSERV at the University of Georgia ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 23 Feb 2014 to 24 Feb 2014 (#2014-32) Table of contents: CamelCase Field Names (Was: Re: HLASM continuation...) (5) ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 20 Feb 2014 to 21 Feb 2014 (#2014-29) (10) camelCase et al CamelCase Field Names (Was: Re: HLASM continuation...) Re: CamelCase Field Names (Was: Re: HLASM continuation...) (02/24) From: Peter Relson <rel...@us.ibm.com> Re: CamelCase Field Names (Was: Re: HLASM continuation...) (02/24) From: Ray Mullins <m...@lerctr.org> Re: CamelCase Field Names (Was: Re: HLASM continuation...) (02/24) From: Ed Jaffe <edja...@phoenixsoftware.com> Re: CamelCase Field Names (Was: Re: HLASM continuation...) (02/24) From: Chuck Arney <ch...@arneycomputer.com> Re: CamelCase Field Names (Was: Re: HLASM continuation...) (02/24) From: Phil Smith III <li...@akphs.com> ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 20 Feb 2014 to 21 Feb 2014 (#2014-29) Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 20 Feb 2014 to 21 Feb 2014 (#2014-29) (02/24) From: John Walker <jwalker...@yahoo.com> Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 20 Feb 2014 to 21 Feb 2014 (#2014-29) (02/24) From: Gord Tomlin <gt.ibm.li...@actionsoftware.com> Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 20 Feb 2014 to 21 Feb 2014 (#2014-29) (02/24) From: zMan <zedgarhoo...@gmail.com> Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 20 Feb 2014 to 21 Feb 2014 (#2014-29) (02/24) From: John McKown <john.archie.mck...@gmail.com> Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 20 Feb 2014 to 21 Feb 2014 (#2014-29) (02/24) From: Tom Thackrey <t...@willglen.com> Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 20 Feb 2014 to 21 Feb 2014 (#2014-29) (02/24) From: John Gilmore <jwgli...@gmail.com> Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 20 Feb 2014 to 21 Feb 2014 (#2014-29) (02/24) From: Kirk Talman <rkueb...@tsys.com> Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 20 Feb 2014 to 21 Feb 2014 (#2014-29) (02/24) From: Kirk Talman <rkueb...@tsys.com> Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 20 Feb 2014 to 21 Feb 2014 (#2014-29) (02/24) From: Paul Gilmartin <paulgboul...@aim.com> Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 20 Feb 2014 to 21 Feb 2014 (#2014-29) (02/24) From: Ed Jaffe <edja...@phoenixsoftware.com> camelCase et al camelCase et al (02/24) From: Kirk Talman <rkueb...@tsys.com> Browse the ASSEMBLER-LIST online archives.
