Thank you Peter. Then is there a reliable method for a non APF authorized program that does not execute continuously to determine whether a capacity on demand upgrade was performed since the last time that same program executed?
Mike Shaw MVS/QuickRef Support Group Chicago-Soft, Ltd. On Jul 1, 2016 8:21 AM, "Peter Relson" <rel...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > >Question: is it incorrect to rely on the presence of a timestamp in the > >SI00LASTUPDATETIMESTAMP field as an indication > >that a capacity on demand upgrade has been done? > > In a word, yes. > > There are system reasons why the STSI information might have been > refreshed. I believe that that includes cases where the hardware has > informed z/OS of a configuration change event that was not due to a > customer-initiated capaciy on demand upgrade. > > > Does your program check the return code after calling the CSRSI service? > > I'm not sure why that is relevant to the question that was asked. > > Peter Relson > z/OS Core Technology Design > >
