> -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER- > l...@listserv.uga.edu] On Behalf Of Peter Relson > Sent: Friday, July 01, 2016 5:21 AM > To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU > Subject: CSRSIIDF Question > > >Question: is it incorrect to rely on the presence of a timestamp in the > >SI00LASTUPDATETIMESTAMP field as an indication > >that a capacity on demand upgrade has been done? > > In a word, yes. > > There are system reasons why the STSI information might have been > refreshed. I believe that that includes cases where the hardware has > informed z/OS of a configuration change event that was not due to a > customer-initiated capaciy on demand upgrade. > > > Does your program check the return code after calling the CSRSI service? > > I'm not sure why that is relevant to the question that was asked.
Because some of the return codes indicate invalid data.
