Well, I found a work-around:
* USING DLTABD,DLTABLE This fails w/ASMA307E
USING DLTABD-4000,DLTABLE-4000 Trick to fool HLASM
My brain exploded trying to figure out the workarounds in the old postings.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Steve Smith <sasd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well if that's the design, then the design is an ass. But I don't see how
> that's the case, as the manual says otherwise.
>
> I finally found Robert Ngan's nearly identical post from 2 years ago, and
> several older ones, too. There was one reference that implied IBM won't
> fix it because of "compatibility" issues. Frankly, that sounds like a
> cop-out; it would be more understandable to just say that it's not a high
> enough priority yet.
>
> And IBM hasn't bothered to update the manual either. Sheesh.
>
> Google was not my friend today. Apparently, the assembler-list archives
> aren't Googleable.
>
> Is there an outstanding SHARE req. for this?
>
> sas
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Paul Gilmartin <00000014e0e4a59b-dmarc-
> requ...@listserv.uga.edu> wrote:
>
>> On 2016-12-20, at 09:13, Steve Smith wrote:
>>
>> > I'm getting an error on a dependent USING apparently just because it's
>> out
>> > of the normal 12-bit offset range...
>> >
>> > This seems to be a HLASM bug to me.
>> >
>> No. WAD. This has been discussed here before. (No, I don't like it.)
>>
>> -- gil
>>
>
>
>
> --
> sas
>
--
sas
