On 10/09/05 04:07 Jeremy McNamara said the following:
It very clearly states in the README in the Asterisk source TLD:
Specific permission is also granted to OpenSSL and OpenH323 to link
with Asterisk.
LINK WITH ASTERISK - A fork is not asterisk.
i'm failing to understand this. person A downloads asterisk from
www.asterisk.org, links in open{ssl,h323} and this is ok.
person B downloads asterisk from www.asterisk.org, modifies some GPLed
asterisk code, links in open{ssl,h323} and distributes sources to the whole
shebang (including the modifications) , and this is not ok ?
i dont think this is the way the GPL and the linking waiver works, but then
IANAL either.
--
Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven."
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (0 0) http://www.alphaque.com/
+==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+
| for a in past present future; do |
| for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do |
| echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." |
| done; done |
+=========================================================================+
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Biz mailing list
Asterisk-Biz@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
