>From what ive read on this list and the wiki, centos 4.x has issues with the TE110P card ( a lot of people having issues after first reboot).Would 3.5 be better (I know [EMAIL PROTECTED] uses this)
Am I right in saying that OS's with the 1.6 kernel still require a lot more "tinkering" than those with the 1.4 kernel ?? Does anybody know what Digiums stance on OS is , I remember speaking to them about 6 months ago and they were recommending a 1.4 kernel version of Debian. Are there any specific disadvantages to running 1.4 kernel ??, -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert La Ferla Sent: 04 January 2006 02:16 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] FC3 or FC1 (or something else?) Michael Stearne wrote: > I am having trouble with FC3. > > After doing a yum update (of 1264 packages) I still cannont compile > 1.2.1 from source: > > make[1]: `libedit.a' is up to date. > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/editline' > make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/db1-ast' > make[1]: `libdb1.a' is up to date. > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/db1-ast' > make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/stdtime' > make[1]: *** No rule to make target > `/usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/3.4.2/include/stddef.h', needed by > `localtime.o'. Stop. > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/asterisk-1.2.1/stdtime' > make: *** [stdtime/libtime.a] Error 2 > > and when I try to update from binary: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -Uvh asterisk-1.2.1-15.rhfc3.at.i386.rpm > warning: asterisk-1.2.1-15.rhfc3.at.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, > key ID 66534c2b > error: Failed dependencies: > libpri.so.1 is needed by asterisk-1.2.1-15.rhfc3.at.i386 > libspandsp.so.0 is needed by asterisk-1.2.1-15.rhfc3.at.i386 > libtonezone.so.1 is needed by asterisk-1.2.1-15.rhfc3.at.i386 > > I have compiled from source 1.0.9 without problem on this machine. > > Any ideas why my attempts are now failing? > > To use the binary, it appears that you need libpri. Look at http://www.asterisk.org (top right hand side) Did you try getting the latest source via "svn" subversion? _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users