On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Wayne <wa...@planetwayne.com> wrote:
> > > Hi Steve, > Thanks for the pointers. I must admit - I was leaning towards 1.6 as > this apparently has support for SIP over TCP (?). My end goal with this > was to try and get Asterisk talking to Exchange 2007 servers unified > messaging. > While I haven't used the SIP over TCP in production (yet), I find that the 1.6.1 series is stable for our environment. I don't know about using Exchange, as we are staying as far from unified messaging as possible (for political reasons of course...) I wouldn't install 1.0, so why go back to 1.2 or 1.4. Just more to learn and relearn. The important thing is to have a test environment to get all of the show stopping buts out. > > As for chan_skinny - I'm currently using this on an existing 1.2 server > although from what I've picked up from previous posts (going back a > while) the inbuilt version is now quite stable and possibly better than > the older 'chan_skinny' (which I think the development has stopped for > now?). This is why I opted to use it for the new 1.6 server. > What is the main reason for staying with skinny on these phones? I have quite a few 7940/7960 converted to SIP that work great. Next week I will try and duplicate this behavior on my test system with skinny, but you should get a bug report filed with the core and important configurations. -Jonathan
_______________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users