On Fri, 26 Nov 2004, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: > On November 26, 2004 11:06 am, Patrick wrote: > > Doesn't "sync source" mean that the card is generating its own clocking? > > If your telco provides the clocking, the card should not. > > 0 = don't use the remote clock for sync (use internal clock) > 1 = use remote clock as card's primary clock source > 2 = use remote clock as card's secondary clock source > 3 = ... > > secondary, tertiary and so on are only used if the primary (or secondary, and > so on) is down. > > A sync source of 0 means self-clock.
I think you may be talking past each other. If the text "ClockSource" appears in /proc/zaptel/[1-8] that span is used as the current clock source. From what Marc has said it is the clock sorce for all spans on the same card. There is a field "timing" in /etc/zaptel.conf that ranks incoming spans in the order they are to be considered as a clock source. If all active spans (presumably on a single card) have their timing set to 0 the card and thus all the spans will be clocked from an internal source. Now, given what has been written on the bug tracker and here I suspect there is a bug in ztcfg. It should set up the clocking independently on the two cards. Perhaps it doesn't? Peter _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users