Let me know if it does and how well if you could as I probably need to 
implement it pretty soon as well, thanks, Mark.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Henry.Coleman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2006 7:54 AM
Subject: Re: [on-asterisk] blind vs. announced transfer


Hi Mark, this solution sounds very practical.
I'll must try this out and see if it works.

Thanks

Henry
--


Henry Coleman [VoIP-PBX.ca]

> From the [EMAIL PROTECTED] handbook.
>
>
> Added to CVS HEAD (=Asterisk 1.2.0) in Jan. 2005:
>
>  ;transferdigittimeout => 3      ; Number of seconds to wait between
> digits
> when transfering a call
>  ;courtesytone = beep            ; Sound file to play to the parked caller
>                                  ; when someone dials a parked call
>  ;xfersound = beep               ; to indicate an attended transfer is
> complete
>  ;xferfailsound = beeperr        ; to indicate a failed transfer
>  ;adsipark = yes                 ; if you want ADSI parking announcements
>  ;pickupexten = *8               ; Configure the pickup extension.
> Default
> is *8
>  ;featuredigittimeout = 500      ; Max time (ms) between digits for
>                                  ; feature activation.  Default is 500
>
>  [featuremap]
>  ;blindxfer => #1                ; Blind transfer, default is #
>  ;disconnect => *0               ; Disconnect
>  ;automon => *1                  ; One Touch Record
>  ;atxfer => *2                   ; Attended transfer
>
>  [applicationmap]
>  ; don't use e.g #9 for applicationmap or featuremap unless you have
> changed
> 'blindxfer' from # to e.g. #1 !
>  testfeature => *9,callee,Playback,tt-monkeys   ;Play tt-monkes to callee
> if
> *9 was pressed - use 'callee' or 'caller'
>
> If you set the variable __TRANSFER_CONTEXT, then that context will be used
> (note the two leading underscores).
> More on this: You need to set a TRANSFER_CONTEXT, either for the
> transferer
> or transferee channel. I dont know why, but res_features give priority to
> the transferee TRANSFER_CONTEXT, if not found, then use the transferer
> TRANSFER_CONTEXT. That context is used to match the extension to dial. So
> you can set this var to any context you want.
>
> Using the blindxfer in [featuremap] section you can redefine the transfer
> key. For example, if the blindxfer is set to "##", transfer only happens
> when you press the "#" key twice very quickly. This solves a problem using
> Asterisk phones to call IVR systems such as those used by banks and credit
> card companies - "Enter you account number followed by the # key".
>
> atxfer allows attended transfer or supervised transfer. It works like
> this:
>
> While on conversation with another party, you dial the atxfer key
> sequence.
> Asterisk says "Transfer" then gives you a dial tone, while put the other
> party on hold music. You dial the transferee number and talk with the
> transferee to introduce the call, then you can hang up and the other party
> will be connected with the transferee. In case the transferee does not
> want
> to answer the call, he/she simply hangs up and you will be back to your
> original conversation.
>
> Note: You MUST use the T and/or t options in the command Dial() in order
> to
> allow the caller and/or callee to use any transfer feature
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nabeel Jafferali" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2006 7:40 PM
> Subject: RE: [on-asterisk] blind vs. announced transfer
>
>
> Henry:
>
> Blind Transfer and Attended Transfer are both provided for in the SIP
> standard, and also in Asterisk's implementation of SIP. It is up to the
> phone.
>
> The Cisco 7960 that I use regularly has both options. So does the snom 320
> currently on the desk in my lab. I'm sure other phones do to, the exact
> ones
> I'm not sure of right now.
>
> Also, the Cisco and the snom can also interrupt the Attended Transfer and
> "take back" the call.
>
> Nabeel
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Apache [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>> Behalf Of Henry.Coleman
>> Sent: April 29, 2006 6:44 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: [on-asterisk] blind vs. announced transfer
>>
>> I have a client who would be very happy with * but for one thing.
>> Actually its not asterisk per-sec, it's that he used to have
>> a key system and * is a PBX. For those who enjoy a challenge
>> here it is:
>>
>> A PBX is superb at the blind transfer of calls:
>> Answer the ringing line hit the TRANSFER button, dial the
>> extension number and hit SEND and the call is off the "board"
>> and it's on to the next call.
>>
>> The problem comes when you need to "Announce" the call to the
>> extension before you send it. On a Key System the attendant
>> can refer to incoming call as being on "Line (x)" and the
>> person can simply select "Line (x)"
>> Obviously with a pbx you can't do this.
>>
>> The challenge then is to be able to announce and transfer a
>> call in one step. This would add a significant feature to *.
>> As far as I am aware no PBX can do this without using a two
>> step process. Here is how I think it should work-
>>
>> Answer the ringing line,
>> select TRANSFER, dial the extension number, announce the call
>> and press the SEND button connecting the incoming call with
>> the extension. Sounds like the first definition but is light
>> years different in functionality.
>> Before you go ahead and solve this don't forget that
>> sometimes the person at the extension will say "no I don't
>> want to talk to this caller" so there must be a way to send
>> the call to VM or reconnect to the caller.
>>
>>
>> I'm using 12 x GXP 2000's in this system Please substitute
>> the codes for "TRANSFER" and "SEND"
>>
>> The customery beer at Tobys awaits the first person to solve this.
>> wait!... make that two beers.
>>
>> Henry
>>
>> --
>> Henry Coleman [VoIP-PBX.ca]
>>
>> --
>> Henry Coleman [VoIP-PBX.ca]
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to