Duane,
You are right that it is not just that simple, I was just trying to
highlight some of the complexities.
Some links to look at:
http://www.rcfp.org/taping/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_tapping
http://www.callcorder.com/phone-recording-law.htm
And even in some of these links you will get some contradictions in the
states listed. This can be due to the dates the data was collected,
and/or the collectors inaccuracy.
Mike
Duane wrote:
Mike Ashton wrote:
Say the other person was in Maryland, well they have a totally
inclusive two party law ( everyone on call needs to be aware in the
case of a conference call ). So if you don't make the person in
Maryland aware, then your breaking Maryland State law, even if your
initiating the call from Ontario.
Actually it's not that simple, when it comes to inter-state in the US,
you fall under US federal laws which tends to side with one party
rather then two party consent...
There was a website on US laws regarding recording of calls but I
can't seem to find it at present...
--
Mike Ashton
Quality Track Intl
Ph: 647-722-2092 x 251
Cell: 416-527-4995
Fax: 416-352-6043
QTI CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
The contents of this material are confidential and proprietary to Quality Track
International, Inc.
and may not be reproduced, disclosed, distributed or used without the express
permission of an authorized representative of QTI.
Use for any purpose or in any manner other than that expressly authorized is
prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error, please immediately delete it
and all copies, and promptly notify the sender.
begin:vcard
fn:Mike Ashton
n:Ashton;Mike
org:Quality Track Intl
adr:;;63 Kenpark Ave;Brmpton;ON;L6Z 3L4;Canada
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:CTO
tel;work:905-840-4995
tel;cell:416-527-4995
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.QualityTrack.com
version:2.1
end:vcard
