Kristian, Ok... you got me curious, so I did a diff between the 2 versions. It looks like most (or all) the differences are due to a change that was committed to a file in Asterisk (indications.c - revision 122314 on Jun 12). Apparently some time-zone structures and method signatures changed. It looks like minor stuff, but probably was needed to compile.
So I have an idea on how to handle this... Why couldn't we make the .mk file for this package aware of which version of Asterisk you were compiling against? That way, it could automatically change it's downloaded/built version based on which version of Asterisk was being used. Doing this it should be transparent and no one would have to remember to upgrade this package when Asterisk was upgraded. Or, is this still too fragile? -Steve Stephen Erisman wrote: > Kristian, > > More info here: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+UNISTIM+channels > > The version that I compiled is 1.0.0.5d which is good for Asterisk 1.4.4 > through 1.4.21. > I am unsure whether upgrading Asterisk to 1.4.22 requires the next > version of this module (1.0.0.5e), or the other way around (i.e. if you > wanted 1.0.0.5e you need at least Asterisk 1.4.22). > I personally don't have any need for this module (at this time), so I > didn't bother to check the differences between the 2 versions. > I can totally understand the nightmare of all the inter-dependencies. > Is there a place to document these dependencies to make it easier when > something needs to be upgraded? > > Apparently support for this is already built into Asterisk 1.6 though, > so maybe this is a non-issue. > Any idea if/when Asterisk 1.6 is on the radar for AstLinux? > > Thanks, > -Steve > > > Kristian Kielhofner wrote: > >> On 10/29/08, Stephen Erisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> Michael, >>> >>> Please try the attached chan_unistim.so module and let me know if it works >>> for you. >>> It looks like you will also need to add a unistim.conf file to the >>> /etc/asterisk directory as well. >>> >>> If everything works, I will package this up and send it to the devs for >>> possible inclusion in future releases. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Steve >>> >>> >>> >> Steve/Michael, >> >> Thanks for helping us with this. >> >> Keep one thing in mind, though... We are reluctant to include >> packages that depend on a specific version of another package. You >> can imagine how difficult upgrades could be with a tangled web of >> dependencies. >> >> With that being said - do the various chan_unistim versions *really* >> depend on specific versions of Asterisk? I don't know how that could >> be possible... >> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Astlinux-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to [EMAIL > PROTECTED] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Astlinux-users mailing list Astlinux-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
