On Nov 10, 2007 12:24 PM, Nick Kossifidis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2007/11/9, Nick Kossifidis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Great work ! i did a diff between your at-ifconfig.log and my > > a-ifconfig.log on rf buffer stuff and it resulted 0 lines ;-) So > > settings are the same for a and turbo a and i guess same goes for g > > and turbo g. > > > > That also means that these settings are static because if they were > calculated using eeprom calibration data (like 5212) they would have > differences between my card and yours. It saves us a lot of trouble... > > anyway there are some iperf tests with the 5413 connected at 18Mb/s on g > mode.. > > mathematix mick # iperf -c 192.168.1.67 -u -b18M -i1 > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Client connecting to 192.168.1.67, UDP port 5001 > Sending 1470 byte datagrams > UDP buffer size: 106 KByte (default) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > [ 3] local 192.168.1.65 port 35551 connected with 192.168.1.67 port 5001 > [ 3] 0.0- 1.0 sec 1.49 MBytes 12.5 Mbits/sec > [ 3] 1.0- 2.0 sec 1.46 MBytes 12.3 Mbits/sec > [ 3] 2.0- 3.0 sec 1.45 MBytes 12.1 Mbits/sec > [ 3] 3.0- 4.0 sec 1.44 MBytes 12.1 Mbits/sec > [ 3] 4.0- 5.0 sec 1.43 MBytes 12.0 Mbits/sec > [ 3] 5.0- 6.0 sec 1.47 MBytes 12.3 Mbits/sec > [ 3] 6.0- 7.0 sec 1.40 MBytes 11.8 Mbits/sec > [ 3] 7.0- 8.0 sec 1.46 MBytes 12.3 Mbits/sec > [ 3] 8.0- 9.0 sec 1.46 MBytes 12.3 Mbits/sec > [ 3] 9.0-10.0 sec 1.53 MBytes 12.8 Mbits/sec > [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 14.6 MBytes 12.2 Mbits/sec > [ 3] Sent 10418 datagrams > [ 3] Server Report: > [ 3] 0.0-10.1 sec 14.6 MBytes 12.2 Mbits/sec 2.336 ms 0/10417 (0%) > [ 3] 0.0-10.1 sec 1 datagrams received out-of-order > mathematix mick #
Nice job man! > I had to force rate because rate control algorithm was stuck at 1Mb/s, This is sample rate by design, I believe it was because some APs (I forget the exact discussion) require management frrames sent at that low rate. After a few packet exchanges it'll pick up. Still sample rate needs a good replacement. > if i set it above 18 i started having data loss but that's ok because > AP is on another room. I'll do some stability tests and let you know > of th results. 18 is the highest 'decent' rate I've been able to get working. The other ones are not working well for me even if I am in front of the AP. I'll be looking into that stuff more now that I am done with the compat work. I'll post more about that shortly. Luis _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
