Pavel, thank you very much for your answer, I understand your point. we might decide to implement Turbo-G ourselves since we have a linux based product and our (single) customer is wanting this feature.
Would you recommend to start on Madwifi or on ATH5k? Does ath5k support AR5006XS (with single chip AR5414) good enough? (we are still using Madwifi) What about the bonding feature, that's not really proprietary, is it? Best Regards, Ralf > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pavel Roskin > Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2008 2:24 AM > To: Ralf Wierse > Cc: ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org > Subject: Re: [ath5k-devel] Turbo-G and Bonding with ATH5K > > > On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 14:34 +0200, Ralf Wierse wrote: > > Dear ath5k hackers, > > > > we are using chipset AR5006XS (with single chip AR5414) > together with > > Linux 2.6 on Freescale processor. > > > > Until now we are using Madwifi and we are seriously missing > two features: > > - Turbo-G on US channel 6 at 2.4GHz (with chip configured > for US regdomain) > > - Bonding of two WLAN devices > > > > We managed to make Turbo-A (108Mbps gross) working at 5GHz > with Madwifi > > but Turbo-G at 2.4GHz seems not to work. > > We never managed to make Bonding working until now. > > > > Can you recommend to switch to ATH5K? Will it work with AR5006XS ? > > Will aht5k provide the two missing features (now or later)? > > I believe it's highly unlikely that mac80211 based drivers like ath5k > will ever support non-standard features like Turbo-G. Well, > maybe after > everything else is working. > > -- > Regards, > Pavel Roskin > _______________________________________________ > ath5k-devel mailing list > ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org > https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
