On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Bob Copeland wrote: > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Bob Copeland <bcopel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Hugh Dickins <h...@veritas.com> wrote: > >> Let me see if I can reproduce the ath5k BUG with a straightforward > >> memhog, repeatedly dirtying more anon memory than RAM can provide. > >> Is there something suitable I could run to exercise that wireless > >> path concurrently? It was just idling when I hit the BUGs before. > > > > Receiving any packets will do it, in your case it was probably > > beacons from nearby APs if you weren't using the wifi. So iperf > > or similar will work. > > Actually it's probably enough to just intentionally fail one > of the allocations in the driver. I'll do that and let you know > if I can easily break it.
Good, that should be a lot quicker. My overnight try with simple memhog, and iperf -s receiving from another machine doing iperf -c at intervals, didn't hit it (but my more involved test wouldn't necessarily have hit it in that time either). Currently trying just a 2.6.28 defconfig kernel build in tmpfs (other filesystems should get their dirty pages pdflushed sooner) along with the iperf, but haven't got the sizes suitably tuned yet. Hugh _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
