On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Bob Copeland wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:35:29 +0000 (GMT), Hugh Dickins wrote > > I'll go ahead and push this upstream then today or tomorrow;
Great, thanks - should include a Cc: sta...@kernel.org I think. > let me know if you run into any problems with more testing. Sure, will do. > > > Changes-licensed-under: 3-Clause-BSD > > > > Hmm, I haven't noticed anyone doing that before: hope you're not > > starting a trend! I think you'll find (Documentation/SubmittingPatches) > > that your Signed-off-by agrees to the Developer's Certificate of Origin > > 1.1, which would put your patch under the same open source licence(s) as > > drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c already contains - that's the usual > > case. > > I agree with all of the above, but the SFLC suggests we do it anyway. > > http://kerneltrap.org/Linux/Wireless_Project_Suggests_Changes-licensed-under_Tag Interesting, thanks a lot for the pointer. I agree very much with Steve and Krzysztof. I'd be inclined to think that adding such a line in some patches would only tend towards making those which omit such a line more questionable for use under the BSD licence i.e. would weaken the BSD position rather than strengthening it as intended - though the Signed-off-by should override even that tendency. But it's certainly not an issue for my attention! Hugh _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
