Hi Bob, On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Bob Copeland wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:35:29 +0000 (GMT), Hugh Dickins wrote > > But I haven't seen any allocation failure for several days. > > I didn't get any while trying to simplify the reproduction, > > I'll go ahead and push this upstream then today or tomorrow; let me > know if you run into any problems with more testing.
Just a prod: I've not seen your fix go into the 2.6.29-rc tree yet. I confess that not even once since then have I seen the page allocation failure which led to the BUG you've fixed: though most of my testing has been on 2.6.29-rc kernels, so my guess would be that something else has changed to make a failure there less likely. But I do still carry your patch, and would be reassured to see it in. Thanks, Hugh _______________________________________________ ath5k-devel mailing list ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org https://lists.ath5k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath5k-devel
