On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Here's what I have so far, this is rebased on top of Senthil's patches >>> for ath9k_htc posted today. Just tested it on my AR9280, it doesn't >>> break anything. >> >> BTW the new ath9k_htc series + this series can be downloaded in one file >> from: >> >> http://bombadil.infradead.org/~mcgrof/tmp/all-ar93xx-03-17-v3.patch > > bleh, I did not use -M here... let me resend with that for the renames.
On second thought John -- please hold off on merging these new ar93xx abstraction patches, we are trying to mathematically prove if ar9002 register definitions are the same as the ar9003 ones and if so well this is all pointless :D Luis _______________________________________________ ath9k-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
