On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 01:44:01PM -0700, John W. Linville wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 06:53:06PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez > > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> Here's what I have so far, this is rebased on top of Senthil's patches > > >>> for ath9k_htc posted today. Just tested it on my AR9280, it doesn't > > >>> break anything. > > >> > > >> BTW the new ath9k_htc series + this series can be downloaded in one file > > >> from: > > >> > > >> http://bombadil.infradead.org/~mcgrof/tmp/all-ar93xx-03-17-v3.patch > > > > > > bleh, I did not use -M here... let me resend with that for the renames. > > > > On second thought John -- please hold off on merging these new ar93xx > > abstraction patches, we are trying to mathematically prove if ar9002 > > register definitions are the same as the ar9003 ones and if so well > > this is all pointless :D > > Did this get resolved?
Yeah but we're just holding off on them for now, we'll send patch bombs next week I think. But please do take the ath9k_htc stuff. Luis _______________________________________________ ath9k-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel
