On Jan 24, 2005, at 5:02 PM, Joe Gregorio wrote:
It reads like more of a guideline than a Pace. Inspecting the format for conformance to these guidelines and generating Paces for non-conformances seems like a better way to proceed than to actually add this text to the spec.
Actually, take a closer look, I got fooled too it first glance: It's talking about how *extensions* should use syntax, not how the spec should. -Tim
