Martin Duerst wrote:
... Bjoern was making a vaild, but fine, point: Because we decided to refer to RFC2396bis, rather than to RFC2396, we already have bought into the fact that RFC2396bis allows percent-encoded domain names, and thus essentially requires IDN support. (apart from the basic fact that no resolver is required to resolve all URIs or IRIs) ...
OK, thanks for making me aware of this subtle change.
> ...
Regards, Julian
-- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760