On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 16:05:57 +0000, Bill de hÓra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Robert Sayre wrote: > > > I think the mapping should be normatively defined w/ XSLT. > > +1. I have no problem with defining the mapping in XSLT. Executable > specs are a wonderful idea.
+1. There still quite a margin for error but XSLT could very neatly provide something deterministic, and ties in nicely with GRDDL. The mapping won't really be complete without an RDF/OWL schema (and probably not even then, given some of the Atom constructs), I would expect that to form part of the I-D (or however it's presented). Another benefit of XSLT is that it should be pretty easy to hook onto a Atom/XML validator to pass to the W3C RDF validator. Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com
