On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 10:07:52 +0000, Bill de hÓra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Otherwise, this thread sounds like resources and representations all > over with the caveat that entry representations are being sourced from > multiple origin servers. It was suggested ages ago that the use of a different URI in <id> than the one which would usually provide representations of the entry resource might be problematic. There's an extra level of indirection between the identified entry resource and it's representations (which are in fact also representations of *other* resources). There doesn't seem to be any violation of webarch with that per se. But if we decide Cool URIs are to be considered an exception rather than the norm and use workarounds to fit with the half-baked 'permalink' practice then confusion is to be expected. Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com
