On Feb 5, 2005, at 6:26 AM, Joe Gregorio wrote:
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 20:25:50 -0800, Mark Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:This specification assigns no significance to the order of atom:entry elements within an Atom Feed Document. Atom Processors MAY present entries in any order, unless a specific ordering is required by an extension.
"""The order of atom:entry elements is typically in reverse chronological order, though feeds MAY be constructed with entries in any order, and this specification assigns no significance to the order of atom:entry elements within an Atom Feed Document."""
I'm +1 on both Mark and Joe's version, slightly stronger on Joe's because I don't think we need drag extensions in. -Tim
