Graham wrote:
> You're shockingly small-minded sometimes Tim.
Do we really need to have this stuff in this forum?
The Macintouch and BBC News feeds that you provide as examples
simply demonstrate that there is a need for some mechanism to specify order
relationships between entries. The mere fact that in older versions of
syndication formats, document order was the only available mechanism for
hinting at these relationships should not be a compelling reason to avoid
defining more useful and robust order-specification mechanisms.
Order relationships between entries should be specified *within*
entries, not implied or derived from the context within which those entries
are found.
"It's about the Entries, Stupid!"
bob wyman
