Sam Ruby wrote:
Julian Reschke wrote:
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Henri Sivonen wrote:
-1 on PaceXhtmlNamespaceDiv
-1 from me as well. It is hack which might be useful for publishing systems (and perhaps aggregators) who do not use the right tools to generate a valid Atom file anyway.
Same here: -1
Can I get one of you three to mock up what Tim's feed should look like?
http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/msg12902.html
- Sam Ruby
I'm not sure I understand this request. We're not asking Tim or anybody else not to use <div> elements, we're asking not to be forced by the spec to select a specific way to emit XHTML when many others do as well.
So, this is a -1 on forcing feed creators to use a very specific serialization format.
Best regards, Julian
-- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
