Eric Scheid wrote:
On 8/2/05 11:56 PM, "Julian Reschke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- if this pace gets accepted, I would ask for the same DIV container element for HTML content for reasons of symmetry."
I thought with @type="HTML" the content gets escaped and thus there is nothing to put into a namespace.
Yes.
I think the issue here is that the Pace combines different requirements (a: let's have a single container element, and b: let's force people to explicitly declare their XHTML ns in a single place). It would be good for the discussion if we could agree about what is still in scope, and what in particular we want to achieve.
Best regards, Julian
-- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
