Tim Bray wrote:
Agreed. Joe, that wasn't very convincing. I repeat, we've seen several very believable use-cases for why someone might want this, and no good arguments (that I can remember) that it would break anything. Sam has pointed out that no previous version of RSS has done this, which is a reasonable argument; except for we have use-cases, and nobody's shown that the cost is non-zero. -Tim
I copied Tim's feed to http://franklinmint.fm/2005/04/03/ongoing.rss and removed the <link> element. This absence caused Bloglines to behave oddly.
Robert Sayre
