On 5/3/05, Tim Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I scanned them and nothing objectionable leapt out at me, but please,
> could a few more people also have a look?

I've never liked the rules in section 6. For example, when presenting
a single option from multiple link elements, UAs should be permitted
to present an alternate in the user's preferred language. I'm pretty
sure this issue was the subject of my first post to atom-syntax. What
a rathole that turned out to be...

Also, the references need updating in some cases, unless they are
supposed to match what's in the HTML drafts. RFC2045 might need to be
updated to the Freed/Klensin draft that the format references.

Robert Sayre

Reply via email to