Bill de hÓra wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
Bill de hÓra wrote:
PaceFeedIdOrAlternate, withdrawn, no comment PaceFeedIdOrSelf 0 PaceOptionalFeedLink +1
I agree with the rationale; no point making people things they can't do. I'm assuming that if PaceOptionalFeedLink goes through feed:id is a MUST.
On what do you base that assumption?
That there is consensus we'll want to identify a feed, even if we can't provide a link.
At the moment, there is not such a proposal on the table for the chairs to even determine if there is consensus around it.
My take (as a non-chair) is that after a lengthy discussion about this, people did want *something* that they could use to identify the feed. Some initially rallied around feed link, some around id, some around feed rel=self. A number of proposals surfaced.
The one proposal on the table that has a chance is PaceFeedIdOrSelf, but it is in trouble.
So, at current course and speed, I see us coming to a conclusion that feed link be made optional with nothing to replace it.
- Sam Ruby
