On May 10, 2005, at 4:37 AM, Graham wrote:


Let's forget about Paces for a minute. Does anyone disagree with the principal of recommending publishers include summaries if they have them available, and aren't supplying atom:content?

Yes, but I'd go further; I'd like to encourage, in general, producers to put more than less stuff in feeds, and provide a summary whenever they possibly can.


My only angst at this moment is whether the canonical SHOULD is the right tool to do that. -Tim



Reply via email to